We represent medical practices, therapy practices, imaging centers, pharmacies and DME suppliers in collecting denied no-fault claims, at arbitration and in court, with our own billing software and data on how arbitrators, insurers and courts decide.
Every deadline in a New York no-fault claim, from the accident to arbitration and court: what the insurer must do and when, what a missed deadline costs each side, and the regulation and decisions behind each rule.
The 30-day rule, verification, IMEs and EUOs, no-shows and the department splits
A calculator that works out the deadlines for your claim's dates
Every rule linked to 11 NYCRR Part 65 and the leading cases
Share of New York no-fault arbitration awards by insurer, per month. Denial rates and settlement habits differ between insurers, so this shows business trends rather than auto insurance market share. Daily award volume
Notable Recent Decisions
Recent rulings from the appellate and trial courts on no-fault claims, with whether the provider or the insurer prevailed.
October 2026 in no-fault law
De novo actions. The Second Department held that dismissing an insurer's Insurance Law § 5106 (c) action for discovery noncompliance revived the dormant master arbitration award for confirmation (Bliss Acupuncture).
Article 75 fees. The First Department held that denying vacatur required confirmation (CPLR 7511 (e)) and the provider was entitled to 11 NYCRR 65-4.10 (j) fees (Midland Pharm.); the Second Department remitted a fee award that stated no basis (Pfeffer).
SUM trigger. The Second Department found SUM coverage not triggered where the tortfeasor's primary and umbrella limits exceeded the SUM policy's liability limits (Erie v Rodriguez).
Late MVAIC claims. Citing Raffellini, the Appellate Term, First Department, held the trial court could not disregard claim time frames on policy grounds and found a four-month delay unjustified (Medical Imaging of Bronx).