November 23, 2018

Sharp View Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51702(U))

Headnote

The relevant facts the court considered were that Sharp View Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. was seeking to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits from GEICO General Insurance Company. The main issue decided was the medical necessity of the services in question. The court precluded the testimony of defendant's expert witness and granted plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict, resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the principal sum of $1,791.73. The holding of the case was that the judgment was reversed and the matter was remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial, in accordance with the decision in another related case.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Sharp View Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51702(U))

Sharp View Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51702(U)) [*1]

Sharp View Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co.

2018 NY Slip Op 51702(U) [61 Misc 3d 147(A)]

Decided on November 23, 2018

Appellate Term, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 23, 2018

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ
2017-590 K C

Sharp View Diagnostic Imaging, P.C., as Assignee of Monique Simpson, Respondent,
against
GEICO General Insurance Company, Appellant.

Law Office of Goldstein & Flecker (Lawrence J. Chanice of counsel), for appellant. Fuld & Karp, P.C. (Cheryl Scher of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Sheares, J.), entered February 17, 2016. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,791.73.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.

At a nonjury trial of this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the sole issue was the medical necessity of the services in question. The Civil Court precluded the testimony of defendant’s expert witness and granted plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict. Defendant appeals from the judgment that was subsequently entered in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $1,791.73.

For the reasons stated in Nova Chiropractic Servs., P.C., as Assignee of Miguel A. Vizcaino v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (__ Misc 3d ___, 2018 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2016-1054 K C], decided herewith), the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: November 23, 2018