November 23, 2018

Nova Chiropractic Servs., P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51690(U))

Headnote

The court considered the issue of the medical necessity of the services in question during a nonjury trial in which a provider was seeking to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits. The Civil Court precluded the testimony of the defendant's expert witness and granted the plaintiff's motion for a directed verdict, resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $2,184.90. The main issue in the case was the admissibility of the defendant's expert witness testimony and the propriety of granting a directed verdict. The holding of the court was that the judgment was reversed, costs were awarded to the defendant, and the matter was remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial. Note: This summary is based on the information provided and does not include specific details from the case such as names of individuals or specific medical services.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Nova Chiropractic Servs., P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51690(U))

Nova Chiropractic Servs., P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51690(U)) [*1]

Nova Chiropractic Servs., P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co.

2018 NY Slip Op 51690(U) [61 Misc 3d 146(A)]

Decided on November 23, 2018

Appellate Term, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 23, 2018

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ
2016-1056 K C

Nova Chiropractic Services, P.C., as Assignee of Iris J. Herrera, Respondent,
against
GEICO General Insurance Company, Appellant.

The Law Office of Printz & Goldstein (Lawrence J. Chanice of counsel), for appellant. Law Offices Emilia I. Rutigliano, P.C. (Emilia I. Rutigliano of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Ingrid Joseph, J.), entered February 3, 2016. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $2,184.90.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.

At a nonjury trial of this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the sole issue was the medical necessity of the services in question. The Civil Court precluded the testimony of defendant’s expert witness and granted plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict. Defendant appeals from the judgment that was subsequently entered in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $2,184.90.

For the reasons stated in Nova Chiropractic Servs., P.C., as Assignee of Miguel A. Vizcaino v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (__ Misc 3d ___, 2018 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2016-1054 K C], decided herewith), the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: November 23, 2018