June 8, 2018

Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v GEICO Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 50865(U))

Headnote

The main issue in the case was whether the plaintiff had failed to appear for scheduled examinations under oath, as alleged by the defendant, and if so, whether that failure justified the denial of no-fault benefits. The court considered the facts of the case, including the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The court ultimately held that the order denying the plaintiff's motion and granting the defendant's cross motion was affirmed, and that the plaintiff had indeed failed to appear for the scheduled examinations under oath, justifying the denial of no-fault benefits.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v GEICO Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 50865(U))

Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v GEICO Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 50865(U)) [*1]

Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v GEICO Ins. Co.

2018 NY Slip Op 50865(U) [59 Misc 3d 152(A)]

Decided on June 8, 2018

Appellate Term, Second Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on June 8, 2018

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ
2015-2001 K C

Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Services; Lyonel F. Paul, M.D., as Assignee of Walters, Alishea, Appellant,
against
GEICO Ins. Co., Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Rivkin Radler, LLP (Cheryl F. Korman and Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Pamela L. Fisher, J.), entered June 18, 2015. The order denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment, and defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath. Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied plaintiff’s motion and granted defendant’s cross motion.

For the reasons stated in Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. etc., as Assignee of Saint-Louis, Lydia v GEICO Ins. Co. (__ Misc 3d ___, 2018 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2015-1996 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: June 08, 2018