April 24, 2008
A.T. Med., P.C. v State Farm Ins. Co. (2008 NY Slip Op 50875(U))
Headnote
Reported in New York Official Reports at A.T. Med., P.C. v State Farm Ins. Co. (2008 NY Slip Op 50875(U))
A.T. Med., P.C. v State Farm Ins. Co. |
2008 NY Slip Op 50875(U) [19 Misc 3d 138(A)] |
Decided on April 24, 2008 |
Appellate Term, Second Department |
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : PESCE, P.J., WESTON PATTERSON and RIOS, JJ
2006-989 Q C.
against
State Farm Ins. Co., Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Gerald Dunbar, J.), entered March 14, 2006, deemed from a judgment entered May 12, 2006 (see CPLR 5501 [c]). The judgment, entered pursuant to the March 14, 2006 order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $3,458.29.
Judgment reversed without costs, order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment vacated and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment denied without prejudice.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and a judgment was subsequently entered pursuant thereto.
On appeal, defendant contends that, in an action brought by defendant herein against health care providers including plaintiff herein, Justice Kenneth Davis of the Nassau County Supreme Court enjoined, inter alia, plaintiff herein, from commencing suit against defendant to recover no-fault benefits during the pendency of the action. Accordingly, defendant argues that the summary judgment motion herein was improperly made. Upon a review of the orders issued by Justice Davis appended to opposition papers below, we agree that the injunction barred the motion.
Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, the order granting summary judgment is vacated and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice.
Pesce, P.J., Weston Patterson and Rios, JJ., concur.