October 27, 2017

Island Life Chiropractic, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51465(U))

Headnote

The court considered the fact that Island Life Chiropractic, P.C. (the appellant) was seeking to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits from Allstate Insurance Company (the respondent), and that the respondent had moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the grounds that they had not issued an insurance policy covering the subject loss. The main issue decided was whether the respondent had issued a policy covering the subject loss, and thus whether the appellant had sued the wrong insurer. The court held that the proof submitted by the respondent was sufficient to establish that they had not issued a policy covering the subject loss, and therefore affirmed the order granting the respondent's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Island Life Chiropractic, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51465(U))

Island Life Chiropractic, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51465(U)) [*1]
Island Life Chiropractic, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co.
2017 NY Slip Op 51465(U) [57 Misc 3d 146(A)]
Decided on October 27, 2017
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on October 27, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ
NO. 2014-2770 Q C

Island Life Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Thony, Adler, Appellant,

against

Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Law Offices of Peter C. Merani, P.C. (Eric M. Wahrburg, Esq.), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Larry Love, J.), entered November 6, 2014. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that defendant had not issued an insurance policy covering the subject loss and, thus, that plaintiff had sued the wrong insurer.

Contrary to plaintiff’s argument, the proof submitted by defendant was sufficient to establish, prima facie, that defendant had not issued a policy covering the subject loss (see Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 44 Misc 3d 136[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 51240[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2014]). Plaintiff’s remaining arguments are either improperly raised for the first time on appeal or lack merit.

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: October 27, 2017