May 24, 2011
LDE Med. Servs., P.C. v Encompass Ins. (2011 NY Slip Op 50979(U))
Headnote
Reported in New York Official Reports at LDE Med. Servs., P.C. v Encompass Ins. (2011 NY Slip Op 50979(U))
LDE Med. Servs., P.C. v Encompass Ins. |
2011 NY Slip Op 50979(U) [31 Misc 3d 148(A)] |
Decided on May 24, 2011 |
Appellate Term, Second Department |
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 2nd, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : WESTON, J.P., GOLIA and RIOS, JJ
2009-1920 Q C.
against
Encompass Insurance, Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Diane A. Lebedeff, J.), entered July 17, 2009, deemed from a judgment of the same court entered August 6, 2009 (see CPLR 5501 [c]). The judgment, entered pursuant to the July 17, 2009 order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $370.34.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, without costs, the order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is vacated and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant
appeals from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. A
judgment was subsequently entered, from which the appeal is deemed to have been taken
(see CPLR 5501 [c]).
Contrary to defendant’s contention, the affidavit submitted by plaintiff’s billing administrator was sufficient to establish that the documents annexed to plaintiff’s moving papers were admissible pursuant to CPLR 4518 (see Art of Healing Medicine, P.C. v Travelers Home & Mar. Ins. Co., 55 AD3d 644 [2008]; Dan Med., P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 14 Misc 3d 44 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2006]). However, as the pertinent facts concerning the failure of plaintiff’s assignor to appear for an examination under oath are the same as those in LDE Med. Servs., P.C. v Encompass Ins. (29 Misc 3d 130[A], 2010 NY Slip Op 51845[U] [App Term, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2010]), for the reasons stated in that case, the judgment is reversed, the order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is vacated and plaintiff’s motion is denied. We reach no other issue. [*2]
Weston, J.P., Golia and Rios, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: May 24, 2011