December 8, 2017

Renelique Med. Servs., P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51728(U))

Headnote

The court considered the provider's failure to appear for scheduled examinations under oath and the timely denial of claims on those grounds. The main issue decided was whether the provider had failed to comply with the requirements for receiving first-party no-fault benefits and if the denial of the claims was justified. The court held that the provider did fail to appear for scheduled examinations under oath and that the claims had been timely denied on that ground. Therefore, the court affirmed the order granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Renelique Med. Servs., P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51728(U))

Renelique Med. Servs., P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51728(U)) [*1]
Renelique Med. Servs., P.C. v Travelers Ins. Co.
2017 NY Slip Op 51728(U) [58 Misc 3d 128(A)]
Decided on December 8, 2017
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on December 8, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ
2014-2629 K C

Renelique Medical Services, P.C., as Assignee of Jason Chadee, Appellant,

against

Travelers Insurance Co., Respondent.

Kopelevich & Feldsherova, P.C. (Galina Feldsherova, Esq.), for appellant. Law Offices of Aloy O. Ibuzor (Gregory W. Broido, Esq.), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Shears, J.), entered October 3, 2014. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Contrary to plaintiff’s arguments on appeal, defendant established that plaintiff had failed to appear for properly scheduled examinations under oath (see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 35 AD3d 720 [2006]) and that the claims had been timely denied on that ground (see Arco Med. NY, P.C. v Lancer Ins. Co., 34 Misc 3d 134[A], 2011 NY Slip Op 52382[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2011]).

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.



ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: December 08, 2017