May 28, 2021

Sufficient Chiropractic Care, P.C. v Global Liberty Ins. Co. (2021 NY Slip Op 50879(U))

Headnote

The court considered an appeal from an order of the Civil Court that granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in a case where a provider sought to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits. The main issue was whether the plaintiff's affidavit submitted in opposition to the defendant's motion was sufficient to rebut the defendant's showing of a lack of medical necessity for the services at issue. The holding of the court was that the plaintiff's affidavit was insufficient to rebut the defendant's prima facie showing of a lack of medical necessity for the services at issue, and therefore affirmed the order granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Sufficient Chiropractic Care, P.C. v Global Liberty Ins. Co. (2021 NY Slip Op 50879(U))

Sufficient Chiropractic Care, P.C. v Global Liberty Ins. Co. (2021 NY Slip Op 50879(U)) [*1]
Sufficient Chiropractic Care, P.C. v Global Liberty Ins. Co.
2021 NY Slip Op 50879(U) [73 Misc 3d 127(A)]
Decided on May 28, 2021
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on May 28, 2021

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: : WAVNY TOUSSAINT, J.P., MICHELLE WESTON, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ
2020-107 K C
Sufficient Chiropractic Care, P.C., as Assignee of Linda Bryant-Williams, Appellant,

against

Global Liberty Insurance Company, Respondent.

Law Office of Melissa Betancourt, P.C. (Melissa Betancourt and Jasmine Koo of counsel), for appellant. Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. (Jason Tenenbaum of counsel), for respondent (no brief filed).

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Rosemarie Montalbano, J.), entered October 17, 2019. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court entered October 17, 2019 granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Contrary to plaintiff’s sole contention on appeal, the affidavit submitted by plaintiff in opposition to defendant’s motion was insufficient to rebut defendant’s prima facie showing that there was a lack of medical necessity for the services at issue (see Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v Integon Natl. Ins. Co., 24 Misc 3d 136[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 51502[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2009]; Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 18 Misc 3d 128[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 52455[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2007]; A. Khodadadi Radiology, P.C. v NY Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 16 Misc 3d 131[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 51342[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2007]).

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

TOUSSAINT, J.P., WESTON and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.



ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: May 28, 2021